CRIME COMMISSIONER: Triumph for Tory but apathy reigns at polls (From Herald Series)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
CRIME COMMISSIONER: Triumph for Tory but apathy reigns at polls
9:00am Saturday 17th November 2012 in News
By Ben Wilkinson, Crime Reporter. Call me on (01865) 425427
Anthony Stansfeld
TORY Anthony Stansfeld will start work as the region’s police and crime commissioner backed by only one in 20 people voting for him and an apparent protest against the new post at the polls.
His victory to be installed as the new man overseeing Thames Valley Police yesterday was overshadowed by a poor turnout across the Thames Valley with just 13.3 per cent of the 1.69m potential voters bothering to turn out. In Oxford it was down to just 10.9 per cent – a fraction of the 29.4 per cent of people who voted in this year’s city council elections.
And as well as apathy, commentators said the election drew a large protest vote with 4.7 per cent of Oxfordshire ballot papers rejected by authorities for being spoiled or marked incorrectly. That compares to just 0.53 per cent in the city council elections.
Mr Stansfeld, the 66-year-old former Army man from Newbury, beat a challenge from Labour candidate Tim Starkey, but needed to go to a count of second preference votes to do so.
He polled 76,011 votes as people’s first choice for commissioner compared to Mr Starkey’s 56,631. Because he did not have an overall majority, voters’ second choice of candidates were counted, leaving the Tory the winner with 94,238 votes in total compared to Mr Starkey’s 70,403.
But that total equates to just 5.5 per cent of every eligible voter in the Thames Valley selecting him as their first or second-choice candidate.
However, last night he defended the new £85,000 role against the poor turnout and high number of spoilt ballots.
He said: “I don’t think it undermines the idea. Having an election in November with dark nights makes it very difficult for people to vote. The next time, when it is held with council elections, the turnout will be highly different.”
When asked about the spoilt ballots he added: “People did not understand the election and said it was politicising the police.
“In fact this is handing down power and it is a far more democratic system then we had before.”
The new commissioner role, which replaces the system of police authorities, will be to set the police budget and the force’s crime-fighting priorities. Mr Stansfeld, whose main office will be in Kidlington, will also have the power to hire and fire the chief constable.
Oxfordshire voted along its recent political allegiances. Mr Starkey won in Oxford but Mr Stansfeld won the other four districts in the county.
Last night city council leader Bob Price said voters who spoiled their ballots were rejecting the whole PCC policy.
He said: “Many people who are very interested in politics have regarded the whole thing as a complete farce.
“They don’t see why the system we have at the moment should change.
“I think people were absolutely rejecting the policy.”
TaxPayers’ Alliance campaign manager Robert Oxley said he had heard about a campaign to encourage voters to spoil ballots in protest.
He supported the new role but said: “Ministers should be held to account for their complete failure to explain the benefits of this policy to the public.
“Clearly a large number of people have spoiled their ballots, and this policy is clearly not without opposition. But it’s not about politicising the police, it’s about making them more accountable, and the system we have at the moment clearly doesn’t do that.”
After he as declared commissioner, Mr Stansfeld revealed he would be appointing police authority member David Carroll as his deputy.
Independent candidate Geoff Howard had a strong showing, coming third overall and beating the Liberal Democrats’ John Howson into fourth and UKIP’s Barry Cooper into fifth.
Another independent, Patience Awe, was last overall.
Comments(8)
Milkbutnosugarplease
says...
12:24pm Sat 17 Nov 12
Watch your back
says...
2:27pm Sat 17 Nov 12
jockox3
says...
2:58pm Sat 17 Nov 12
Milkbutnosugarplease
: Now you can see the problem with simply not voting. You do get lumped in with the "can't be bothered" majority. At least a spoiled ballot gets counted and seen by agents and candidates. Your non-vote does not. Remember the number of times in the past when a non-vote has been assumed to be a "yes" vote. Can't say that with a message on your ballot paper.
But I think I'm going to get a postal vote in future. Then, in the comfort of your own home you can write what you want. It's a bit obvious in a polling booth you are doing more than making on, or two in this case, crosses!
Pavinder Msvarensy
says...
2:58am Sun 18 Nov 12
jockox3
says...
3:59am Sun 18 Nov 12
jockox3
says...
4:01am Sun 18 Nov 12
Severian
says...
12:46am Tue 20 Nov 12
The whole process is almost criminal in the way so much public money was spent for so long a time on so much, to achieve so little.
At least in some areas there were independent candidates with genuine experience, whereas we in TV just had the main parties trotting out some tired old faces.
All we have achieved is to allow a few old politicos to fatten up their pensions a bit more than they otherwise would have done. And remove almost all the oversight of our police, which now sits in the hands of just one politically oriented commissioner.
jockox3 says...
11:17am Sat 17 Nov 12
Let's hope the ballot spoilers have got a taste for this little form of protest. Join us! It can be fun working out what to write, or a fictitious candidate to write-in in protest. My choice, DS James Hathaway would have done a wonderful job I believe. Setting a Cambridge man amongst Oxford police would have ruffled a few feathers I have no doubt :)