News RSS Feed


Weir on way out

Mike Hill at Northmoor Weir on the River Thames Mike Hill at Northmoor Weir on the River Thames

OFFICIALS from the Environment Agency have insisted health and safety issues mean they must update a weir, after an MP stepped into the row.

Oxford West and Abingdon MP Nicola Blackwood wrote to the Health & Safety Executive for clarification on whether Northmoor Weir, near Eaton – one of the last of its type on the River Thames – had to be replaced on safety grounds.

But an HSE spokesman said: “It’s not within HSE’s regulatory remit to make decisions on replacing this weir.”

The Environment Agency said it had a legal duty to its employees to replace one of the few remaining paddle and rymer weirs with a modern motorised weir.

But local residents, who consider the 115-year-old weir to be of historic value, say the change would be a waste of money.

Innes Jones, the agency’s area manager, said: “We now have three separate reports warning of long-term health issues for our lock-keepers in continuing to operate these weirs.

“As a responsible employer, we must not ignore this advice. We already ensure our lock staff receive the best manual handling training, but that cannot ensure their long-term health when operating the weirs.”

The law requires employers to do whatever is practicable to ensure the health, safety and welfare of staff.

Northmoor Weir is one of five remaining paddle and rymer weirs, which are unique to the Thames.

The weirs are operated by placing large wooden posts – the rymers – into the bottom of the river. To control the water flow, paddles of different heights are placed against the rymers.

Of the 44 weirs on the Thames, nine were worked by paddle and rymer but four have now been updated.

Eaton resident Mike Hill, of the Northmoor Weir Campaign, said: “There’s a health and safety risk in all aspects of life but training a lock-keeper is the most cost-effective way of dealing with it. Millions of pounds could be misspent in the name of flood protection and health and safety.

“There are growing numbers of people from Appleton, Eaton and Northmoor who want the EA to redirect their flood budget allocation to where the risk is greatest.”

Work at Northmoor, which is expected to cost £2.5m, will begin in March.

Comments(7)

FarmerG says...
5:43pm Mon 13 Feb 12

It defies belief that the EA persist in wanting to destroy Northmoor Weir at a cost of millions on the flimsy pretext of health and safety. The Health and Safety Executive are clear that H&S actions should be proportional to the risk involved. In this case there has never been a serious operator safety issue at any time in the history of Northmoor Weir. Understand, too, that the money will come from the Flood Levy Budget, reducing the amount available for real flood prevention.

sparro says...
6:07pm Mon 13 Feb 12

Health & safety issue`s are a joke. I worked this weir, at the age of 18 in 1959, as I did with most weir`s between St Johns lock & Benson lock, as relief lock keeper. I never had an accident or any problems. If you are trained correctly, it is a simple job.
Health and safety is blamed for everything these days. Save the weir, I say

Eaton Resident says...
6:25pm Mon 13 Feb 12

Someone in the Environment Agency has decided that they are going to replace this weir come hell or high water. They aren't interested in H&S or flooding. These are just the excuses they're using. The flooding issue is only so they can fund the work out of the flood defence budget and the H&S is to give some sort of legitimacy to their actions. Sparro is not the only lock keeper to have operated Paddle and Rymer weirs. The last lock keeper at Northmoor was there for 32 years - he fought to save the weir from mechanisation when it was refurbished in 1995. It came under exactly the same H&S regulations then!

Weir watch says...
8:40pm Mon 13 Feb 12

There is no legal duty to replace a weir. There is only a legal duty to manage risk - not eliminate it altogether as the Environment Agency have claimed. To use flood defence money to do this, when there will be no additional protection from flood demonstrates total misappropriation of funds that could be used to save someone's home or business from disaster. In times where government spending is being cut, we should be taking this department to task for its half truth, deception and contradictory arguments in the media. I understand that the Environment Agency refused a public debate on this matter. Perhaps they should reconsider and tell us the truth!

oyuncu says...
10:02pm Mon 13 Feb 12

This is a ridiculous waste of money. The EA are planning to spend at least £2.5 million from the flood budget on health and safety grounds, when actually there have been no proven accidents or serious health issues in any weir over the last 100 years. Meanwhile, next year the amount of money in the flood budget for the whole of Oxford where many houses and businesses were badly flooded not so long ago will be cut to just £5,000 over 5 years ie £1,000 a year. The paddle and rhymer weir is also a piece of the Thames's heritage, and they are going to rip it out under false pretexts.

nwappleton says...
12:57pm Tue 14 Feb 12

The TWO H&S reports are based on debatable science as witnessed by a Professor of Physics at Oxford University. Obvious safety measures are already in place and a training schedule will cover the long term protection of lock keepers. This money should be spent on protecting the homes and businesses of Oxford rather than destroying what is going to become the last example of paddle & rymer weirs in Europe.

jsheldon44 says...
1:21am Wed 15 Feb 12

This has nothing to do with HSE. The EA want to dispense with all Thames lock keepers, and sell the cottages. Mechanisation of the weir will achieve this.

click2find

Most popular