Hospitals trust spending more on agency staff

OXFORD’S hospitals are spending more on bank and agency staff less than a year after the NHS trust announced plans to cut the bill.

In the first quarter of 2012, the Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) Trust spent £5.2m on bank and agency staff – £700,000 more than the same period last year.

It comes at a time when the trust faces making £160m of cuts over the next four years and a year after it said it planned to reduce the number of costly bank and agency staff it used in a bid to cut down costs.

By the end of June 2012, expenditure on bank and agency staff, including overtime, was 6.2 per cent of total pay spend across the John Radcliffe, Churchill, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre and Horton hospitals.

The trust said it was having to rely on bank staff because vacancies were running higher than expected.

It said: “This position reflects that some areas are experiencing demand for services above the agreed contract with the PCT and also that some divisional schemes have not yet started to fully deliver the planned savings.

It added: “The trust is currently running with a vacancy rate of eight per cent. This would ordinarily be expected to be closer to five per cent.”

Related links

A recruitment programme is under way to cut the use of bank and agency staff.

The £160m of savings – about five per cent of the OUH total budget – are being made as part of a Government drive to slash £20bn from the cost of the NHS.

OUH chief executive Sir Jonathan Michael said the trust was faced with £49m worth of savings over the next year alone.

Last year the trust faced savings of about £52m and had threatened to cut 670 full-time posts.

But Sir Jonathan said the bed-blocking crisis, which is seeing well patients staying in hospital longer, meant the trust could not make losses of that scale, because it had to keep an extra 120 beds open to deal with demand.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:52pm Wed 26 Sep 12

Andrew:Oxford says...

Vacancies probably wouldn't be quite so high if there wasn't competition from other trusts for the same qualified staff.

Apparently, hospitals in Milton Keynes, Swindon, Reading, High Wycombe, Aylesbury and Coventry don't ration parking - yet offer the same level of salary.

Then there is the London allowance... Just an hour or so away.
Vacancies probably wouldn't be quite so high if there wasn't competition from other trusts for the same qualified staff. Apparently, hospitals in Milton Keynes, Swindon, Reading, High Wycombe, Aylesbury and Coventry don't ration parking - yet offer the same level of salary. Then there is the London allowance... Just an hour or so away. Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 0

8:28am Thu 27 Sep 12

Mark L. says...

At the same time, staff have been made redundant.Short staffing has been an ongoing problem on th ewards where my wife works, for years now. Also many staff are leaving the NHS as they are fed up with how they are treated.
At the same time, staff have been made redundant.Short staffing has been an ongoing problem on th ewards where my wife works, for years now. Also many staff are leaving the NHS as they are fed up with how they are treated. Mark L.
  • Score: 0

9:24am Thu 27 Sep 12

Myron Blatz says...

Because agency staff can be terminated at short notice. Nor do they cost the Trusts money on sick leave or pensions, and they are less likely to take industrial action, or be dictated to by the white collar trade unions.
Because agency staff can be terminated at short notice. Nor do they cost the Trusts money on sick leave or pensions, and they are less likely to take industrial action, or be dictated to by the white collar trade unions. Myron Blatz
  • Score: 0

11:15am Thu 27 Sep 12

Mark L. says...

Myron Blatz wrote:
Because agency staff can be terminated at short notice. Nor do they cost the Trusts money on sick leave or pensions, and they are less likely to take industrial action, or be dictated to by the white collar trade unions.
Many of my friends are Doctors,Nurses and Paramedics. None ever have, or would take industrial action. As for the RCN, they are useless and spineless. If it wasn't for the fact to be a Nurse you have to be in the RCN, my wife wouldn't. Especially as she has to pay £120 for the privelage.
[quote][p][bold]Myron Blatz[/bold] wrote: Because agency staff can be terminated at short notice. Nor do they cost the Trusts money on sick leave or pensions, and they are less likely to take industrial action, or be dictated to by the white collar trade unions.[/p][/quote]Many of my friends are Doctors,Nurses and Paramedics. None ever have, or would take industrial action. As for the RCN, they are useless and spineless. If it wasn't for the fact to be a Nurse you have to be in the RCN, my wife wouldn't. Especially as she has to pay £120 for the privelage. Mark L.
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree