Microbrewery fined for failing to protect workers

A microbrewery has been fined £6,000 for health and safety failings.

Oxfordshire Ales Limited, based in Marsh Gibbon, near Bicester, was warned in May 2010 that it needed to take action after the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) served an improvement notice requiring action to protect workers transferring materials from racking to processing machinery.

A visiting HSE inspector raised concerns about the manual handling operations, which included filling hoppers with malt and barley with employees lifting heavy sacks weighing up to 25kg in awkward circumstances.

The notice required the company to carry out a thorough assessment of the handling risks and to take appropriate action.

Aylesbury Magistrates’ Court heard on Monday that little had changed when HSE revisited the brewery on November 8, 2010, and again on February 3, 2011.

Concerns were also raised about a mezzanine floor which was accessible via inadequate steps.

A second improvement notice was served in March 2011 to trigger action on this failing before improvements were made.

Oxfordshire Ales Limited, of Pear Tree Industrial Units, Bicester Road, Marsh Gibbon, has been fined £6,000 and ordered to pay £8,623 in costs for breaching Section 21 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.

The company pleaded guilty to the offences at an earlier hearing.

HSE Inspector Stephen Manley said: “The response to the original improvement notice was disappointing to say the least.

“The improvements were necessary in order to protect workers from injury and prevent falls, yet the company took far too long to take appropriate action. Thankfully no employees were hurt, but there were clear risks that could easily have been remedied a lot sooner.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:40am Fri 5 Oct 12

snert says...

Companies need to comply with these laws despite how ludicrous some of them are in a bid to help stop the UK turning into the US, ie a litigation state. Those adverts on the TV aimed at getting people to try their luck in suing their employers for breaking a nail need culling. It's sad how things are going.
Companies need to comply with these laws despite how ludicrous some of them are in a bid to help stop the UK turning into the US, ie a litigation state. Those adverts on the TV aimed at getting people to try their luck in suing their employers for breaking a nail need culling. It's sad how things are going. snert

9:55am Fri 5 Oct 12

Victor's_friend says...

Perhaps the company thought that the authorities were taking the peewee so ignored them. Were they invisaging an accident that was so remote here because the workers knew what they were doing? Shame the authorities aren't so tough in actual dangerous situations where incidents happen - what do they say to the victims' families.

So watch out for Mr Manley - sounds like that man on the buses!
Perhaps the company thought that the authorities were taking the peewee so ignored them. Were they invisaging an accident that was so remote here because the workers knew what they were doing? Shame the authorities aren't so tough in actual dangerous situations where incidents happen - what do they say to the victims' families. So watch out for Mr Manley - sounds like that man on the buses! Victor's_friend

4:52pm Mon 8 Oct 12

paul from Kennington says...

snert wrote:
Companies need to comply with these laws despite how ludicrous some of them are in a bid to help stop the UK turning into the US, ie a litigation state. Those adverts on the TV aimed at getting people to try their luck in suing their employers for breaking a nail need culling. It's sad how things are going.
They were given fair warnings, only themselves to blame, but the fines were so paltry that it was cheaper to pay them than make the improvements.
[quote][p][bold]snert[/bold] wrote: Companies need to comply with these laws despite how ludicrous some of them are in a bid to help stop the UK turning into the US, ie a litigation state. Those adverts on the TV aimed at getting people to try their luck in suing their employers for breaking a nail need culling. It's sad how things are going.[/p][/quote]They were given fair warnings, only themselves to blame, but the fines were so paltry that it was cheaper to pay them than make the improvements. paul from Kennington

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree