Didcot RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Villagers call for new bridge over Thames

Campaigners on Clifton Hampden bridge Campaigners on Clifton Hampden bridge

VILLAGERS living near Didcot are demanding a new bridge over the Thames to cope with extra traffic created by more than 2,000 proposed new homes.

As part of South Oxfordshire District Council’s core strategy – a development blueprint for the next 15 years – about 10,000 new homes are planned for the district including about 9,000 homes in the Didcot area.

But before the core strategy can be approved, residents are being given the opportunity to tell a planning inspector if they disagree with elements of the plans for new homes.

And residents in Didcot and surrounding villages are complaining that SODC has failed to draw up plans for enough new infrastructure to cope, including new roads.

Chairman of Long Wittenham Parish Council Tom Bowtell said he and parish council chairmen from neighbouring villages would address the planning inspector next Tuesday and Thursday to spell out concerns.

He said: “As part of the core strategy there are plans for more than 2,000 new homes north of the Ladygrove estate, alongside the B4016 Didcot to Appleford road.

“The (Thames) bridges at Clifton Hampden and at Culham are already at full capacity and there is no provision in the core strategy for a new bridge.

“At the moment there are 500 vehicle movements per hour over Clifton Hampden bridge and villagers in the area believe it is at full capacity.

“If the core strategy gets the go-ahead, then building work will start on the first of these 2,000 homes straight away and once they are built there could be at least 2,000 new cars in the area.

“We don’t believe SODC has properly investigated north-south traffic movements and all the transport studies so far have concentrated on east-west traffic between Didcot and Grove.”

Mr Bowtell said Long Wittenham parish council has objected to the plan for the new homes and added that Clifton Hampden, Dorchester, North Moreton, Little Wittenham and Appleford parish councils would also make submissions to the planning inspector.

Didcot town council leader Margaret Davies said the town council was also concerned about the lack of infrastructure for 2,330 new homes north of the town.

She said: “The new homes will have water and electricity but there are no proper transport links drawn up and residents in East and West Hagbourne are also very concerned.”

A spokesman for South Oxfordshire District Council said: “Providing new infrastructure to go with the new housing proposed for Didcot is very important for the council.

“The policies in the core strategy, which will be tested this month by an independent planning inspector, are designed to ensure that a range of infrastructure improvements and new facilities are delivered along with the new homes.

“These include a new secondary school, a new sports centre, green infrastructure and transport improvements. These are set out in the Joint Didcot Infrastructure Delivery Plan, prepared jointly by South Oxfordshire and the Vale of White Horse district councils.”

Comments(8)

Andrew:Oxford says...
8:08am Wed 2 Nov 11

There is a definite need for an improved road network and a new bridge in that area.

It isn't just the economically active of Didcot, travelling to Oxford, who are congesting Long Wittenham, it's also the large number of people who live in South Oxford and work in London heading the opposite direction to Didcot Parkway Rail Station.

Bypassing Chiselhampton would also improve access to Haddenham & Thame Parkway Rail Station.

Gunslinger says...
10:11am Wed 2 Nov 11

Basically what is needed is a proper M40 to A34 link, somewhere between Abingdon and Didcot.

This would also relieve traffic pressures in Abingdon, allow downgrading of the minor roads (including the A415), and improve communications to developing employment sites like Milton Park and Harwell.

What are the chances of getting it?

Zero in the current financial climate, unless financed by major new deveopment over and above anything already agreed or proposed.

Adrian1 says...
1:00pm Wed 2 Nov 11

Perhaps it could take those lost 30 something ton trucks who use the 7.5 ton bridge too as their sat navs don't seem to have a weight limit function,... or width, or turning circle calculator etc. On the bright side, if they keep using the bridge we'll need a new one anyway as it'll be the basis for a ford instead!

Oxfdom says...
6:32pm Wed 2 Nov 11

Although the bridge isn't great, there's very rarely queues and replacing it would be very expensive. Surely it makes sense to focus attention on areas where there are already queues, like the top of Lady Grove, and the traffic lights at Clifton Hampden, where improvements would be much cheaper.

auzo says...
10:53pm Wed 2 Nov 11

I'd like to know who did the counting for this story? I use the Clifton Hampden bridge regularly and cannot see how 500 cars could possibly go over it in 1 hour!
This is a story about villagers who do not want the 200 houses built and are trying to do anything and everything to stop it happening, even if it means makeing up lies!
Yes its a small one way travell bridge, but the ques for it are NEVER bad.
This realy is a non story.

didcotgirl1 says...
7:52pm Fri 4 Nov 11

It's absolutely crazy! This country is already vastly overpopulated in relation to its size. And all the existing infrastructure is already overstretched & has eaten into way too much of the countryside. Dont want any more of that going on either. What we need to do is to deport a few thousand unwelcome intruders/criminals then we wouldnt need to keep adding to this madness. Should solve most of our problems. Bring back Enoch Powell.

Natural says...
3:25pm Sat 5 Nov 11

I failing to see a need for a new bridge.

It would be nice and save around 1-2 mins commute on occasion, but this bridge has never been an issue for me, usually no queues at all hardly.

As for the "500 cars per hour", I would guess this could be possible during peak times, but again, it's not a problem and not consistent.

I have seen signs in Long Whittenham saying "say no to the 2000 houses". I think these protests are more about people being irrationally annoyed.

To improve Long Whittenham traffic issues - stop parents parking cars outside the immediate school entrance. This has more congestion problems than the bridge.

sgb514 says...
10:38am Sun 13 Nov 11

1) Put a roundabout here: http://g.co/maps/hsw
74
2) Put a roundabout here:
http://g.co/maps/a5f
8u
3) Keep the bumps but remove the chicanes in Long Wittenham (what is the point of them when you have bumps?)

click2find

Most popular