Power turned off as Didcot A station is finally closed down

Margaret Davies by Didcot Power Station Buy this photo » Margaret Davies by Didcot Power Station

AFTER 42 years of powering the nation, Didcot A Power Station will shut down today.

At 2.30pm the switch will be flicked, bringing an end to electricity production for the National Grid.

RWE npower staff will gather in the station’s canteen to watch a live feed from the control room to see the final desynchronisation.

And, from 6.30pm, to mark the final day, lasers will be used to project a message of thanks on to the station, saying ‘Powering the nation 1970-2013’.

Didcot A manager Phil Noake said: “Didcot A first started operations in 1970, and has been an unsung hero of our economy ever since, helping to keep the lights on and Britain working 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week for more than 40 years.

“This is a time to reflect on the fantastic team we have had and to thank the local community for supporting us during that time.

“This closure, driven by government policy, reflects the changing shape of power generation in the UK.”

Didcot Town Council leader Margaret Davies said: “The cooling towers are so large, and the power station has been such a big part of our lives that it’s hard to believe it is not going to be powering away any more.

“The cooling towers have been a reassuring sight, a friendly giant, but the closure paves the way for when the cooling towers will be demolished and vanish completely from the skyline.”

Kelly Green, 32, of Greater Leys, made national news after appearing in the Oxford Mail for having the cooling towers tattooed on her shin.

She said: “It is a big day, whatever everyone outside Didcot thinks, and a sad time. The real change will come when they knock them down.

“I think that’s when people will really see the difference and it will start to sink in. We’ll just have to wait and see what happens after that and what the future holds.”

Paul Bodsworth, 41, who puts unusual pictures of Didcot on a Facebook page said: “It may be difficult for people not from the town to understand. The truth is, it is something for the people here.

“There isn’t a lot in Didcot and the towers are something that distinguish it from other places.Yes, coal is outdated and we probably will be better off without them spewing off into the sky but there is a sense of loss.”

RWE npower announced the closure of the 2,000MW station in September.

After opting out of a European Union Large Combustion Plant Directive in 2008, it was required to stop generating power after 20,000 hours of operation.

About 210 staff work at Didcot A, while about 80 staff work at the gas-fired Didcot B station, which was built in 1997 and will continue to operate.

Some staff at Didcot A will remain for a decommissioning process lasting about nine months, while others will take redundancy or move to other power stations.

Decomissioning will begin at the end of the month.

Vendel Segesdy, a construction engineer at Didcot A since 1969, who lives in Didcot, said: “It’s a sad day for everyone.

“There’s going to be a big gathering of staff and former staff at Didcot Conservative Club next Thursday at 2pm. It will probably go on all night.”

Comments(13)

Megs says...
12:46pm Fri 22 Mar 13

I managed the Didcot Power station construction account at the CEGB's HQ in London, during the 1960s and, of course, I support wholeheartedly it's purpose, now done with.

In the 60s I didn't know I would be moving to within a stone's throw of it in 1975. Now I won't be at all sorry to see it come down. I live closer than folk in Didcot and it's been a real, if necessary, blot on my landscape. I'm looking forward to renewed views and no steam blotting out the sun.

I wish everyone involved with the power station good fortune, as they move on.

Lord Palmerstone says...
12:52pm Fri 22 Mar 13

What a wise government to shut down generating capacity. All of us who've been out this morning certainly feel the global warming in the air.Coming from the east, isn't it? We'll not need much leccy now it's so, so warm.
And don't believe that the Chinese are building so many fossil fuel plants that whatever we do isn't going to make as much difference as a pitcher of warm spit. That's just anti-warmist propaganda and people who say it should be made to listen to Nobel Prize Al Gore DVD's for eternity.

Adrian1 says...
1:15pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Figure about all the site is good for, and we do need them, is to build a new power station there. Didcot C anyone? Guess it'd need to be gas too.

koftheb says...
2:40pm Fri 22 Mar 13

About time! Look forward to it coming now and no longer destroying my view on the way to work as well as polluting the air for miles around and costing the NHS billions.

EMBOX2 says...
2:40pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Assuming the land can't be used for housing (and save nearby villages from being swallowed up) then it should be another power generating site.

More warehousing/distribu
tion is not what Didcot needs. Skilled jobs are what power stations provide, so build another.

It has all the right ingredients for a new station, so maybe that's its best use.

EricTheRed says...
4:15pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Yep Bring on Didcot C.. The site is ideal for another Gas Powered station.. i mean the cooling towers are already there surely it would save on demolition costs...

the wizard says...
7:16pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Along with many others I was an apprentice at Didcot A. I left in December '72 and went to Aberthaw B which will run for a few years yet.

On leaving the power industry I returned as a contractor to Didcot A & B quite a few times. My later employers around the area liked ex power station men as we has a good grasp of the bigger spectrum and wider fields of engineering, a good return on our training.

A big shame to see Didcot A close especially when there is so much life left in the equipment, a decision which some may come to regret when the lights start to go out. The nations strategy of replacing stations like Didcot seems to be flawed and not necessarily well thought out, but then again until you have worked within the industry you would have little appreciation of what the demands really are.

Lord Palmerstone says...
9:14am Sun 24 Mar 13

the wizard wrote:
Along with many others I was an apprentice at Didcot A. I left in December '72 and went to Aberthaw B which will run for a few years yet.

On leaving the power industry I returned as a contractor to Didcot A & B quite a few times. My later employers around the area liked ex power station men as we has a good grasp of the bigger spectrum and wider fields of engineering, a good return on our training.

A big shame to see Didcot A close especially when there is so much life left in the equipment, a decision which some may come to regret when the lights start to go out. The nations strategy of replacing stations like Didcot seems to be flawed and not necessarily well thought out, but then again until you have worked within the industry you would have little appreciation of what the demands really are.
The problem is that the politicians are concerned with theology-the Gore Faith in Manmade Global Warming . They are now nearly all "professional politicians" i.e. know nothing of anything except politicking. Even heard one Social Democrat female say she'd been put off a "career" in politics by being goosed at a Liberal conference or suchlike, years ago. It should not be a "career"; it should be a vocation for mature people with knowledge. It isn't;hence turning the nation's lights off in pursuit of a chimera.

bobn87 says...
3:24pm Sun 24 Mar 13

What a mad decision to force the closure of an economic, serviceable power station as energy prices soar way above inflation and the UKs energy supply diminishes. Major industries have left the UK due to the increasing electricity costs and our sad Governing parties - Lib,Lab,Con - all conspire to impoverish the Nation. All 3 sad loser Parties have enslaved themselves to the EUs diktats and bought into an unproven 'man-made Global warming' (sic) theology. Climate change is a natural event (like earthquakes!) and has been going on for millenia (or did power stations cause the ice-ages?!). Climate change is not caused by CO2, which is an unproven theory that has become a religion. climate change is driven by the suns fluctuations and the earths fluctuating orbit about it. So now the UK economy is being crippled by the Lib, Lab, Con worship of EU diktat and unproven assumptions. Next they'll make policy using the zodiac - oops they probably do! When the lights go out remember - we told you so. Vote for energy and growth - vote against the Lib, Lab, Con failures.

museli says...
4:46pm Tue 26 Mar 13

Lord Palmerstone wrote:
the wizard wrote:
Along with many others I was an apprentice at Didcot A. I left in December '72 and went to Aberthaw B which will run for a few years yet.

On leaving the power industry I returned as a contractor to Didcot A & B quite a few times. My later employers around the area liked ex power station men as we has a good grasp of the bigger spectrum and wider fields of engineering, a good return on our training.

A big shame to see Didcot A close especially when there is so much life left in the equipment, a decision which some may come to regret when the lights start to go out. The nations strategy of replacing stations like Didcot seems to be flawed and not necessarily well thought out, but then again until you have worked within the industry you would have little appreciation of what the demands really are.
The problem is that the politicians are concerned with theology-the Gore Faith in Manmade Global Warming . They are now nearly all "professional politicians" i.e. know nothing of anything except politicking. Even heard one Social Democrat female say she'd been put off a "career" in politics by being goosed at a Liberal conference or suchlike, years ago. It should not be a "career"; it should be a vocation for mature people with knowledge. It isn't;hence turning the nation's lights off in pursuit of a chimera.
You seem to be asking that politicians are both 'mature people with knowledge' and climate change deniers at the same time - I think you'll find they are mutually exclusive. I'm not aware of any peer reviewed science that backs up the silly claims of the deniers though you've only got to scratch the surface to see who their paymasters are.

Whatever the rights or wrongs of closing Didcot A right now it doesn't change the fact that we are frittering away our chances of preserving a stable climate for future generations.

Lord Palmerstone says...
7:12pm Tue 26 Mar 13

museli wrote:
Lord Palmerstone wrote:
the wizard wrote:
Along with many others I was an apprentice at Didcot A. I left in December '72 and went to Aberthaw B which will run for a few years yet.

On leaving the power industry I returned as a contractor to Didcot A & B quite a few times. My later employers around the area liked ex power station men as we has a good grasp of the bigger spectrum and wider fields of engineering, a good return on our training.

A big shame to see Didcot A close especially when there is so much life left in the equipment, a decision which some may come to regret when the lights start to go out. The nations strategy of replacing stations like Didcot seems to be flawed and not necessarily well thought out, but then again until you have worked within the industry you would have little appreciation of what the demands really are.
The problem is that the politicians are concerned with theology-the Gore Faith in Manmade Global Warming . They are now nearly all "professional politicians" i.e. know nothing of anything except politicking. Even heard one Social Democrat female say she'd been put off a "career" in politics by being goosed at a Liberal conference or suchlike, years ago. It should not be a "career"; it should be a vocation for mature people with knowledge. It isn't;hence turning the nation's lights off in pursuit of a chimera.
You seem to be asking that politicians are both 'mature people with knowledge' and climate change deniers at the same time - I think you'll find they are mutually exclusive. I'm not aware of any peer reviewed science that backs up the silly claims of the deniers though you've only got to scratch the surface to see who their paymasters are.

Whatever the rights or wrongs of closing Didcot A right now it doesn't change the fact that we are frittering away our chances of preserving a stable climate for future generations.
"You seem to be asking that politicians are both 'mature people with knowledge' and climate change deniers at the same time - I think you'll find they are mutually exclusive. I'm not aware of any peer reviewed science that backs up the silly claims of the deniers though
Whatever the rights or wrongs of closing Didcot A right now it doesn't change the fact that we are frittering away our chances of preserving a stable climate for future generations"
Yes, that's right. Whatever happens in China and India can't possibly affect us can it , provided we shut down generating capacity and can't make a cup of tea unless the wind's blowing?
As Nevill Chamberlain once said, and I paraphrase, "India and China are far off countries of which we know little"
Indeed I expect there was a lot of "peer-reviewed" (pseudo)science to substantiate Vitalstatistix's cogent belief that the sky was about to fall on him.
"you've only got to scratch the surface to see who their paymasters are".Indeed you have . Building non-functional windmills is a displacement activity but not so aesthetic as building cathedrals for the same purpose (placating the gods so they don't reign pestilence on us) but a darned sight more profitable for the useful idiots of the warmist theology, eh, Dave's dad-in -law?

museli says...
8:21pm Tue 26 Mar 13

Well one thing we DO know about India and China is that there per capita CO2 output is much lower than ours. Another interesting fact about China is that it it has more wind generation capacity than any other country - bit of an odd investment if they are non-functional.

Lord Palmerstone says...
2:03pm Wed 27 Mar 13

museli wrote:
Well one thing we DO know about India and China is that there per capita CO2 output is much lower than ours. Another interesting fact about China is that it it has more wind generation capacity than any other country - bit of an odd investment if they are non-functional.
And one thing we might hypothesise about India and China is that it is their ambition to achieve what we currently have, prosperous citizens, and to that end they are constructing an enormous number of fossil fuel power plants. Which is just as well for China; it'll need them when the wind doesn't blow, and of course the "on-off" cycle with the ludicrous windmills is a far greater consumer of gas. However, we shall not be more prosperous than them much longer with vile "Green" taxes, so no doubt we'll win your praise (through your chattering teeth) for our rapidly falling emission of CO2-in fact your dream may be realised in that many elderly in Britain will cease emitting CO2 orally at all.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree